Christianity Reinterpreted: Racial Purity and Divine Favoritism

Christianity Reinterpreted: Racial Purity and Divine Favoritism

By

The mainstream narrative of Christianity is under intense scrutiny as radical interpretations challenge its core tenets. Testimony reveals a starkly different version of the faith, one that emphasizes racial purity and divine favoritism, turning traditional Christian teachings on their head.

According to this perspective, the well-known biblical quote, “Depart from me, I never knew you,” takes on a chillingly exclusive meaning. Rather than a universal declaration of judgment against the unrighteous, it is seen as a decree reserved for those not of pure white, Abrahamic descent. This interpretation suggests a racially exclusive path to salvation, with no hope for those deemed “bastards, niggers, chinks, and squat monsters.”

Key points of this controversial interpretation include:

  • Racial Purity as a Prerequisite: Only racially pure descendants of Abraham are guaranteed salvation, purchased by Christ’s blood.
  • Divine Law Inscribed: Racially pure white men have the law written on their hearts by Yahweh, making adherence unavoidable.
  • Exclusion of Other Races: Non-white individuals are considered outside the scope of salvation, with no immortal spirit or divine connection.
  • Christ’s Mission Defined: Christ’s mission was exclusively for the “lost sheep of the house of Israel,” not for other races.

This interpretation paints a picture of a tribal god who favors a specific lineage. For those within this chosen group, salvation is unconditional; for those outside, oblivion awaits.

Moreover, historical revisionism challenges the conventional narrative of Jesus’ life. According to one source, Jesus was the son of Caesars adoptive stepson Juba II,- whom married Caesars ex girlfriend Cleopatra VII’s daughter Cleopatra Selene II when Augustus won the battle of Actium. (Juba II went there as well just for fun, although he was just a teen).Jesus said to “leave to Caesar what was his and to the Lord what was his”,- because the Caesar-Priestgod dichotomy was Caesar and Cleopatras original wish, but which Augustus brought into being by marrying Juba II to Cleopatras daugther after her and Mark Anthonys defeat.Juba II developed into a rival of the Herods because he basically had the legitimate male claim to Egypt and thus also potentially Judea.Augustus sent Juba II to babysit his grandson-and-heir Gaius Caesar in Galilee between 2bc-2ad.This is why baby Jesus and his adoptive parents had safe travels into Egypt and Galilee, as well as being family-friends with the richest tradesman of Galilee.

The implications of this radical reinterpretation of Christianity are profound. It not only challenges the universality of Christian love and salvation but also suggests a hidden racial agenda within the faith’s origins. This perspective offers a glimpse into a hidden reality where race determines one’s spiritual destiny.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *