–>
For centuries, we’ve been taught that the Earth is a sphere, a globe spinning through space. But what if that was a lie? A growing body of evidence suggests that the Earth might not be the globe we’ve been told it is, and the implications are staggering.
One critical point centers on the behavior of water. Witnesses argue that large bodies of water at rest always lie flat, existing within a container. This challenges the notion of water clinging to a spinning ball. Think about it: water always seeks its level. It needs a container to stay put. Is the ground elevation the container that keeps the water flat?
Another key observation deals with the shape of the Earth itself. The Pythagorean theorem, used to calculate the Earth’s radius, assumes a perfect sphere. But if the Earth isn’t a perfect sphere, these calculations become useless. Could this be why images of Earth from space, like the famous Apollo 17 “Blue Marble” photo, show a perfect sphere while gravity maps depict a more irregular shape, like an upside-down pear? Why would a camera, even with zoom capabilities, fail to capture the “real shape” of the Earth?
Further muddying the waters is the phenomenon of refraction—the bending of light as it passes through the atmosphere. Refraction changes with elevation, which can affect astronomical observations and measurements of distance. How can we be sure that the calculations used to prove the globe are accurate when atmospheric conditions can significantly alter the results?
Some point to inconsistencies in how we observe celestial bodies. One individual recounts observing the moon at 4:46 pm, noting that the lit portion of the moon faced away from the sun’s supposed position relative to Earth. How can the top half of the moon facing Earth be lit when the face of the moon facing the observer is in darkness, according to the globe model?
Here’s a summary of the mounting evidence:
- Water’s nature: Large bodies of water at rest lie flat.
- Shape inconsistencies: Calculations rely on the Earth being a perfect sphere which it is not, based on gravity maps.
- Refraction complexities: Atmospheric conditions distort light and affect measurements.
- Lunar anomalies: Observations of the moon’s illumination contradict the globe model.
These points, taken together, raise serious questions about the true shape of our world. Is it time to reconsider everything we’ve been told? The evidence suggests that the Earth might be flat, and the implications are nothing short of revolutionary.
Leave a Reply